AG: The answer to the question is hard for me because, on the one hand, I think that we should feel really great about the fact that the Republican nominee -- certain nominee -- John McCain, and both of the finalists for the Democratic nomination -- all three have a very different and forward-leaning position on the climate crisis. All three have offered leadership, and all three are very different from the approach taken by the current administration. And I think that all three have also been responsible in putting forward plans and proposals. But the campaign dialogue that -- as illustrated by the questions -- that was put together by the League of Conservation Voters, by the way, the analysis of all the questions -- and, by the way, the debates have all been sponsored by something that goes by the Orwellian label, "Clean Coal." Has anybody noticed that?
- Odgovor na to pitanje je težak za mene jer, s jedne strane, mislim da bi nam trebalo biti stvarno drago zbog činjenice da republikanski kandidat, konkretan kandidat, John McCain i oba finalista za demokratsku nominaciju - svi troje imaju bitno drugačiju i naprednu poziciju o klimatskoj krizi. Svi troje su ponudili vodstvo i svi troje imaju vrlo drugačiji pristup od pristupa koji ima trenutna vlada. I mislim da su svi troje bili odgovorni u predlaganju planova i davanju prijedloga. Ali... dijalog u kampanji - kako su ona pitanja ilustrirala - pitanja koja je prikupila Liga glasača za očuvanje okoliša, usput, analiza svih pitanja - i usput, sve debate je sponzoriralo nešto Orwellovskog naziva: "Čisti ugljen". Je li to netko primijetio?